Castles in Shropshire
|
The building material was dependent on the available
resources, the time scale, the labour force and the financial situation of the
castle builder. Some wealthy Earls were able to use building materials from other parts
of the country, and if this was the case, would invariably be building mainly in
stone.
|
|
Many of the castles in Shropshire used local stones for
construction purposes. This includes different types of sandstone and
limestone, the latter often being used for facing material.
|
|
|
|
As a wide variety of geology exists in the County, it is likely that the local
geology of the specific area was exploited for building materials. More
information on the geology of Shropshire can be found at http://www.shropshiregeology.org.uk
|
|
|
Castles also took advantage of natural landscape features to enhance
their defensive strength. In Shropshire, Bridgnorth Castle is sited on a
sandstone promontory and Caus Castle uses the elevated position of a
natural hill. Ludlow Castle also utilises a natural ridge of high ground
which is defended on three sides by the river Teme.
|
|
|
|
It is important to remember, however, that castles built in stone
are not necessarily later in date than timber ones. In fact, some castles were
built in stone from the beginning, and this is true of both France and
Shropshire. Ludlow castle, for example, was provided with stone
defenses from the
beginning.
Furthermore, although it is easy to assume that stone castles
superseded timber ones, excavation and archaeological evidence has shown that
timber was still used as a building material. Castles were, therefore, never
entirely built of stone. A mixture of technology was always the norm. This
included timber, stone, and
earthwork components.
|
|
Stokesay Castle
is an excellent example of how timber and stone were used together. It is also
important to remember that timber was not socially lower in status than stone.
|
|
|
Shrewsbury Castle was itself built of timber up until the late 13th
century. As timber rots more easily than stone, only archaeological excavation
can reveal clues to timber construction. Although timber was cheaper and quick
to build with, it was also highly vulnerable to fire and therefore presented a
greater risk to those who lived in the castle.
|
|
Building in stone did not guarantee survival of the castle
either. Throughout the Medieval period and beyond, castles were exposed to
purposeful
destruction by enemy forces trying to seize political control. Bridgnorth
Castle is an excellent example of this. In 1646, during the Civil
War,
Parliamentary forces tunneled under the walls, undermining
and
blowing up the castle, forcing Sir Robert Howard to surrender. Because of this,
the remains of the castle keep lean at a seventeen-degree angle. This is three
times further than the Leaning Tower of Pisa.
|
|
|
|
This Learning Zone was researched, written and designed by Natalie Gibbs whilst working as a Volunteer.
|